<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BackgrounDRb 1.0 released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/</link>
	<description>On Ruby, Rails, Concurrency and fiction</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 23:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hemant</title>
		<link>http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-2079</link>
		<dc:creator>Hemant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-2079</guid>
		<description>I think, you need to explicitly require dependent libraries and provide absolute path for your po files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think, you need to explicitly require dependent libraries and provide absolute path for your po files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hansaka</title>
		<link>http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-2047</link>
		<dc:creator>Hansaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 04:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-2047</guid>
		<description>Hi....
I'm new to BackgrounDRb plug-in......

I got a problem when I use this plug-in. How can I use PO files with this tool.

I'm sending regular e-mails to registered users in the site with new information. The relevant .rhtml file contains PO injections as follow.
Ex:
   :  - This is showing in the received e-mail as follow.
  user_name : Hansaka

All the relevant PO strings have been saved in the file and converted into .MO file. But if I send this mail with using web application I'm getting the correct string as follow,
  user name : Hansaka

The PO files are not taking in BackgrounDRb I guess. Please help me to solve this....!!!!
Thanks....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi&#8230;.<br />
I&#8217;m new to BackgrounDRb plug-in&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>I got a problem when I use this plug-in. How can I use PO files with this tool.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sending regular e-mails to registered users in the site with new information. The relevant .rhtml file contains PO injections as follow.<br />
Ex:<br />
   :  - This is showing in the received e-mail as follow.<br />
  user_name : Hansaka</p>
<p>All the relevant PO strings have been saved in the file and converted into .MO file. But if I send this mail with using web application I&#8217;m getting the correct string as follow,<br />
  user name : Hansaka</p>
<p>The PO files are not taking in BackgrounDRb I guess. Please help me to solve this&#8230;.!!!!<br />
Thanks&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hemant</title>
		<link>http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-1751</link>
		<dc:creator>Hemant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-1751</guid>
		<description>Would you care to post a stack trace? Either on BackgrounDRb mailing list or directly to me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you care to post a stack trace? Either on BackgrounDRb mailing list or directly to me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somaking</title>
		<link>http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-1738</link>
		<dc:creator>somaking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-1738</guid>
		<description>I get consistent connection errors on linux and leopard with the latest source.  Would love for this to work, but packet seems to be a dud.  I've been trying to trace down the issue, and it points to packet.  

Too bad.  I'm ready to toss out a lot of work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get consistent connection errors on linux and leopard with the latest source.  Would love for this to work, but packet seems to be a dud.  I&#8217;ve been trying to trace down the issue, and it points to packet.  </p>
<p>Too bad.  I&#8217;m ready to toss out a lot of work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olle Jonsson</title>
		<link>http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>Olle Jonsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-864</guid>
		<description>Big thanks for this release, hemant. Nice to see some deprecation work going on, too. Good job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big thanks for this release, hemant. Nice to see some deprecation work going on, too. Good job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hemant</title>
		<link>http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>Hemant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-848</guid>
		<description>Matt, I will love to have Windows support. But it requires non-trivial amount of work. But, don't give up hope, I am currently working to get test cases and other stuff going, I need to settle down a bit, before starting work on Windows version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, I will love to have Windows support. But it requires non-trivial amount of work. But, don&#8217;t give up hope, I am currently working to get test cases and other stuff going, I need to settle down a bit, before starting work on Windows version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-828</guid>
		<description>Hemant, I just upgraded to the 1.0.1 release it looks great from what I've read, but sadly I cannot run it under windows.  Is there any hope on the horizon of getting a windows version, or should I look into other solutions? The main problem from what I can see is the dependency on UNIXSocket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hemant, I just upgraded to the 1.0.1 release it looks great from what I&#8217;ve read, but sadly I cannot run it under windows.  Is there any hope on the horizon of getting a windows version, or should I look into other solutions? The main problem from what I can see is the dependency on UNIXSocket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hemant</title>
		<link>http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>Hemant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-669</guid>
		<description>I see that the patch just enables rails applications that are using BackgrounDRb to run properly. Well, this shouldn't be harder to get working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see that the patch just enables rails applications that are using BackgrounDRb to run properly. Well, this shouldn&#8217;t be harder to get working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamas Tompa</title>
		<link>http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamas Tompa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-665</guid>
		<description>Hello,

in the previous version (0.2.x) there was a patch to run on windows:
http://backgroundrb.devjavu.com/ticket/42

can anybody send a new patch for the current version?

Thanks,
Tamas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>in the previous version (0.2.x) there was a patch to run on windows:<br />
<a href="http://backgroundrb.devjavu.com/ticket/42" rel="nofollow">http://backgroundrb.devjavu.com/ticket/42</a></p>
<p>can anybody send a new patch for the current version?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Tamas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hemant</title>
		<link>http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Hemant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-546</guid>
		<description>Well, first try the latest release from trunk. Let me know about any problems you are facing on the backgroundrb mailing list. We can sort this out, if you provide more information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, first try the latest release from trunk. Let me know about any problems you are facing on the backgroundrb mailing list. We can sort this out, if you provide more information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
