Comments on: BackgrounDRb 1.0 released http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/ On Ruby, Rails, Concurrency and fiction Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:47:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: chetan http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-3285 chetan Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:45:58 +0000 http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-3285 Hemant Am using backgroundrb for non-stop-continuous crawling using rxml+rfeedparser+nokigiri+mechanize mix. same jobs is distributed to separate-workers. Monitoring the main BGRB pids ok , however need is to take control on each workers in separate if dies with errors . We use GOD + SHELL scripts to monitor PIDS. please updates any tricks or option todo so. Best chetanM Hemant

Am using backgroundrb for non-stop-continuous crawling using rxml+rfeedparser+nokigiri+mechanize mix. same jobs is distributed to separate-workers.

Monitoring the main BGRB pids ok , however need is to take control on each workers in separate if dies with errors .

We use GOD + SHELL scripts to monitor PIDS.

please updates any tricks or option todo so.

Best

chetanM

]]> By: Mullai http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-3276 Mullai Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:00:25 +0000 http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-3276 Hemant, We were using the older version of Backgroundrb which was developed by 'Ezra Zygmuntowicz' on a windows system (Rails 2.0.2, ruby 1.8.6). But since now we are planning to move to Rails 2.2.2 I had to install the backgroundrb plugin again. I was able to install fine (after a couple of tries) but unfortunately i cannot start it. There are some *nix specific code like fork etc., I read your comment here that you are planning to develop Windows support for backgroundrb. Can you please update on that? I appreciate your response. Thx, Mullai Hemant,

We were using the older version of Backgroundrb which was developed by ‘Ezra Zygmuntowicz’ on a windows system (Rails 2.0.2, ruby 1.8.6). But since now we are planning to move to Rails 2.2.2 I had to install the backgroundrb plugin again. I was able to install fine (after a couple of tries) but unfortunately i cannot start it. There are some *nix specific code like fork etc., I read your comment here that you are planning to develop Windows support for backgroundrb. Can you please update on that? I appreciate your response.

Thx,
Mullai

]]> By: Hemant http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-2079 Hemant Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:01:55 +0000 http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-2079 I think, you need to explicitly require dependent libraries and provide absolute path for your po files. I think, you need to explicitly require dependent libraries and provide absolute path for your po files.

]]> By: Hansaka http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-2047 Hansaka Fri, 27 Jun 2008 04:35:19 +0000 http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-2047 Hi.... I'm new to BackgrounDRb plug-in...... I got a problem when I use this plug-in. How can I use PO files with this tool. I'm sending regular e-mails to registered users in the site with new information. The relevant .rhtml file contains PO injections as follow. Ex: : - This is showing in the received e-mail as follow. user_name : Hansaka All the relevant PO strings have been saved in the file and converted into .MO file. But if I send this mail with using web application I'm getting the correct string as follow, user name : Hansaka The PO files are not taking in BackgrounDRb I guess. Please help me to solve this....!!!! Thanks.... Hi….
I’m new to BackgrounDRb plug-in……

I got a problem when I use this plug-in. How can I use PO files with this tool.

I’m sending regular e-mails to registered users in the site with new information. The relevant .rhtml file contains PO injections as follow.
Ex:
: - This is showing in the received e-mail as follow.
user_name : Hansaka

All the relevant PO strings have been saved in the file and converted into .MO file. But if I send this mail with using web application I’m getting the correct string as follow,
user name : Hansaka

The PO files are not taking in BackgrounDRb I guess. Please help me to solve this….!!!!
Thanks….

]]> By: Hemant http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-1751 Hemant Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:03:10 +0000 http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-1751 Would you care to post a stack trace? Either on BackgrounDRb mailing list or directly to me? Would you care to post a stack trace? Either on BackgrounDRb mailing list or directly to me?

]]> By: somaking http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-1738 somaking Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:34:19 +0000 http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-1738 I get consistent connection errors on linux and leopard with the latest source. Would love for this to work, but packet seems to be a dud. I've been trying to trace down the issue, and it points to packet. Too bad. I'm ready to toss out a lot of work. I get consistent connection errors on linux and leopard with the latest source. Would love for this to work, but packet seems to be a dud. I’ve been trying to trace down the issue, and it points to packet.

Too bad. I’m ready to toss out a lot of work.

]]> By: Olle Jonsson http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-864 Olle Jonsson Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:16:28 +0000 http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-864 Big thanks for this release, hemant. Nice to see some deprecation work going on, too. Good job. Big thanks for this release, hemant. Nice to see some deprecation work going on, too. Good job.

]]> By: Hemant http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-848 Hemant Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:23:20 +0000 http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-848 Matt, I will love to have Windows support. But it requires non-trivial amount of work. But, don't give up hope, I am currently working to get test cases and other stuff going, I need to settle down a bit, before starting work on Windows version. Matt, I will love to have Windows support. But it requires non-trivial amount of work. But, don’t give up hope, I am currently working to get test cases and other stuff going, I need to settle down a bit, before starting work on Windows version.

]]> By: Matt http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-828 Matt Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:46:32 +0000 http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-828 Hemant, I just upgraded to the 1.0.1 release it looks great from what I've read, but sadly I cannot run it under windows. Is there any hope on the horizon of getting a windows version, or should I look into other solutions? The main problem from what I can see is the dependency on UNIXSocket. Hemant, I just upgraded to the 1.0.1 release it looks great from what I’ve read, but sadly I cannot run it under windows. Is there any hope on the horizon of getting a windows version, or should I look into other solutions? The main problem from what I can see is the dependency on UNIXSocket.

]]> By: Hemant http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-669 Hemant Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:24:02 +0000 http://gnufied.org/2007/12/20/backgroundrb-10-released/#comment-669 I see that the patch just enables rails applications that are using BackgrounDRb to run properly. Well, this shouldn't be harder to get working. I see that the patch just enables rails applications that are using BackgrounDRb to run properly. Well, this shouldn’t be harder to get working.

]]>