Comments on: Bleeding Edge Version of BackgrounDRb for better memory usage http://gnufied.org/2008/05/21/bleeding-edge-version-of-backgroundrb-for-better-memory-usage/ On Ruby, Rails, Concurrency and fiction Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:43:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Hemant http://gnufied.org/2008/05/21/bleeding-edge-version-of-backgroundrb-for-better-memory-usage/#comment-3099 Hemant Fri, 31 Oct 2008 05:18:02 +0000 http://gnufied.org/2008/05/21/bleeding-edge-version-of-backgroundrb-for-better-memory-usage/#comment-3099 Jesse: ask_worker() API has been deprecated. You got to adapt to newer api. Jesse:

ask_worker() API has been deprecated. You got to adapt to newer api.

]]> By: links for 2008-10-24 « Caiwangqin’s delicious bog http://gnufied.org/2008/05/21/bleeding-edge-version-of-backgroundrb-for-better-memory-usage/#comment-3092 links for 2008-10-24 « Caiwangqin’s delicious bog Fri, 24 Oct 2008 23:05:08 +0000 http://gnufied.org/2008/05/21/bleeding-edge-version-of-backgroundrb-for-better-memory-usage/#comment-3092 [...] Bleeding Edge Version of BackgrounDRb for better memory usage | A Place for my head (tags: BackgrounDRb background rubyonrails rails) [...] [...] Bleeding Edge Version of BackgrounDRb for better memory usage | A Place for my head (tags: BackgrounDRb background rubyonrails rails) [...]

]]> By: Jesse http://gnufied.org/2008/05/21/bleeding-edge-version-of-backgroundrb-for-better-memory-usage/#comment-3089 Jesse Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:27:34 +0000 http://gnufied.org/2008/05/21/bleeding-edge-version-of-backgroundrb-for-better-memory-usage/#comment-3089 i'm trying backgroundrb 1.1, i can start backgroundrb service, but MiddleMan.all_worker_info is empty. i'm using packet (0.1.14),chronic (0.2.3) i have searched from google, and got many same error about : Invalid worker with name notice_worker and key /var/lib/gems/1.8/gems/packet-0.1.14/lib/packet/packet_connection.rb:52:in `ask_worker' ... I'm trying to get packet-0.1.6.gem, it's very had to reach github for me, cause i'm behind GFW, GFW is suck! i’m trying backgroundrb 1.1, i can start backgroundrb service, but MiddleMan.all_worker_info is empty.

i’m using packet (0.1.14),chronic (0.2.3)

i have searched from google, and got many same error about : Invalid worker with name notice_worker and key
/var/lib/gems/1.8/gems/packet-0.1.14/lib/packet/packet_connection.rb:52:in `ask_worker’
…

I’m trying to get packet-0.1.6.gem, it’s very had to reach github for me, cause i’m behind GFW, GFW is suck!

]]> By: matt http://gnufied.org/2008/05/21/bleeding-edge-version-of-backgroundrb-for-better-memory-usage/#comment-3087 matt Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:11:37 +0000 http://gnufied.org/2008/05/21/bleeding-edge-version-of-backgroundrb-for-better-memory-usage/#comment-3087 can someone please look into this i have the same problem http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=23495 can someone please look into this i have the same problem
http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=23495

]]> By: chirp.syxyz.net » Blog Archive » upgrading backgroundrb, the fun way. http://gnufied.org/2008/05/21/bleeding-edge-version-of-backgroundrb-for-better-memory-usage/#comment-2249 chirp.syxyz.net » Blog Archive » upgrading backgroundrb, the fun way. Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:22:23 +0000 http://gnufied.org/2008/05/21/bleeding-edge-version-of-backgroundrb-for-better-memory-usage/#comment-2249 [...] the worker control code now is totally changed, and the Worker class itself needs to inherit from BackgrounDRb::MetaWorker now. Having taken care of these and a few other cleanups, we seem to be running with a much smaller [...] [...] the worker control code now is totally changed, and the Worker class itself needs to inherit from BackgrounDRb::MetaWorker now. Having taken care of these and a few other cleanups, we seem to be running with a much smaller [...]

]]> By: Lukas Rieder http://gnufied.org/2008/05/21/bleeding-edge-version-of-backgroundrb-for-better-memory-usage/#comment-2210 Lukas Rieder Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:01:40 +0000 http://gnufied.org/2008/05/21/bleeding-edge-version-of-backgroundrb-for-better-memory-usage/#comment-2210 Really Important is to REMOVE THE OLD FILES GENERATED FROM backgroundrb:setup! This saved my day (and night probably too). Thanks for sharing, Have a nice day! Lukas Really Important is to REMOVE THE OLD FILES GENERATED FROM backgroundrb:setup!
This saved my day (and night probably too).

Thanks for sharing,

Have a nice day!

Lukas

]]> By: Hemant http://gnufied.org/2008/05/21/bleeding-edge-version-of-backgroundrb-for-better-memory-usage/#comment-2201 Hemant Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:46:57 +0000 http://gnufied.org/2008/05/21/bleeding-edge-version-of-backgroundrb-for-better-memory-usage/#comment-2201 Melvin: There is already one: http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/backgroundrb-devel Melvin:

There is already one:

http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/backgroundrb-devel

]]> By: Melvin Ram http://gnufied.org/2008/05/21/bleeding-edge-version-of-backgroundrb-for-better-memory-usage/#comment-2200 Melvin Ram Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:16:50 +0000 http://gnufied.org/2008/05/21/bleeding-edge-version-of-backgroundrb-for-better-memory-usage/#comment-2200 I agree there should be a mailing list for asking questions and answering them as I didn't know there was an update to my question till today. I vote for using Google Groups. PS: Thanks Hemant for the update. I give it a go over the next week. I agree there should be a mailing list for asking questions and answering them as I didn’t know there was an update to my question till today.

I vote for using Google Groups.

PS: Thanks Hemant for the update. I give it a go over the next week.

]]> By: Hemant http://gnufied.org/2008/05/21/bleeding-edge-version-of-backgroundrb-for-better-memory-usage/#comment-1973 Hemant Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:51:37 +0000 http://gnufied.org/2008/05/21/bleeding-edge-version-of-backgroundrb-for-better-memory-usage/#comment-1973 Walther, It would be a good idea to contact mailing list for such questions. But anyways, I guess, looks like you need to require some controller that you are using in your model or some crap like that. Wordpress is not letting code pass cleanly and hence you can use pastie to paste the code. Walther,

It would be a good idea to contact mailing list for such questions. But anyways, I guess, looks like you need to require some controller that you are using in your model or some crap like that. Wordpress is not letting code pass cleanly and hence you can use pastie to paste the code.

]]> By: Walther http://gnufied.org/2008/05/21/bleeding-edge-version-of-backgroundrb-for-better-memory-usage/#comment-1971 Walther Sat, 14 Jun 2008 01:23:04 +0000 http://gnufied.org/2008/05/21/bleeding-edge-version-of-backgroundrb-for-better-memory-usage/#comment-1971 Okay, so I try just once more :( I wanted to show you that when I call my invoice.print_invoice from the console - everything is ok - but when I call it from my billing_worker - I only get the logger to write the first logger.info entry, and it does not finish work at all. the first comment holds my billing_worker, the next comment shows how I call the worker from the console - and the stack trace from backgrounDRB started without the start argument. the comment right above shows the print_invoice method in my invoice.rb model can you help me? cheers, walt Okay,

so I try just once more :(
I wanted to show you that when I call my invoice.print_invoice from the console - everything is ok - but when I call it from my billing_worker - I only get the logger to write the first logger.info entry, and it does not finish work at all.

the first comment holds my billing_worker, the next comment shows how I call the worker from the console - and the stack trace from backgrounDRB started without the start argument. the comment right above shows the print_invoice method in my invoice.rb model

can you help me?

cheers,
walt

]]>