<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amarok2 and redefinition of awesomeness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gnufied.org/2009/01/23/amarok2-and-redefinition-of-awesomeness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gnufied.org/2009/01/23/amarok2-and-redefinition-of-awesomeness/</link>
	<description>On Ruby, Rails, Concurrency and fiction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:17:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosalyn Lask</title>
		<link>http://gnufied.org/2009/01/23/amarok2-and-redefinition-of-awesomeness/#comment-3546</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosalyn Lask</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnufied.org/?p=119#comment-3546</guid>
		<description>Awesome post, I am an avid reader of your site, keep on posting that great content, and I will be a regular for a long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome post, I am an avid reader of your site, keep on posting that great content, and I will be a regular for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: woodshit</title>
		<link>http://gnufied.org/2009/01/23/amarok2-and-redefinition-of-awesomeness/#comment-3497</link>
		<dc:creator>woodshit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 07:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnufied.org/?p=119#comment-3497</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s 2 Feb 2010 and Amarok 2.2.2 is still a cry of pain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s 2 Feb 2010 and Amarok 2.2.2 is still a cry of pain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hemant</title>
		<link>http://gnufied.org/2009/01/23/amarok2-and-redefinition-of-awesomeness/#comment-3183</link>
		<dc:creator>Hemant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnufied.org/?p=119#comment-3183</guid>
		<description>@Nikolaj:
Yes, I am aware about bugs.kde.org, still I was expecting a link. BTW, I am sure you guys have better ideas about Context view, but wasn&#039;t it unfair to take an idea thats still in infancy and slap it on the users. Stability doesn&#039;t mean that app shouldn&#039;t crash, but it should work too.

@Max Kanat-Alexander:
I wouldn&#039;t know where to start. I don&#039;t know how much change Bugzilla is willing to accommodate in simplifying its user interface. Besides that I have very different ideas about Issue/Bug tracking, so much so that I am working on one right now. I am sorry, but I have to say no. Good luck though, I hope Bugzilla gets better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nikolaj:<br />
Yes, I am aware about bugs.kde.org, still I was expecting a link. BTW, I am sure you guys have better ideas about Context view, but wasn&#8217;t it unfair to take an idea thats still in infancy and slap it on the users. Stability doesn&#8217;t mean that app shouldn&#8217;t crash, but it should work too.</p>
<p>@Max Kanat-Alexander:<br />
I wouldn&#8217;t know where to start. I don&#8217;t know how much change Bugzilla is willing to accommodate in simplifying its user interface. Besides that I have very different ideas about Issue/Bug tracking, so much so that I am working on one right now. I am sorry, but I have to say no. Good luck though, I hope Bugzilla gets better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PirateTux</title>
		<link>http://gnufied.org/2009/01/23/amarok2-and-redefinition-of-awesomeness/#comment-3182</link>
		<dc:creator>PirateTux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnufied.org/?p=119#comment-3182</guid>
		<description>I have always been a huge fan of amarok, and used it even though I have used GNOME exclusively until recently.  I was happy when I switched to the new KDE to be able to run amarok where it belonged.

Anyway, 2 has run stable for me, and I have it running constantly.

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always been a huge fan of amarok, and used it even though I have used GNOME exclusively until recently.  I was happy when I switched to the new KDE to be able to run amarok where it belonged.</p>
<p>Anyway, 2 has run stable for me, and I have it running constantly.</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Kanat-Alexander</title>
		<link>http://gnufied.org/2009/01/23/amarok2-and-redefinition-of-awesomeness/#comment-3181</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Kanat-Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnufied.org/?p=119#comment-3181</guid>
		<description>Bugzilla absolutely can be improved. :-) We&#039;ve made some UI improvements in 3.2, and we&#039;d like to make more. You&#039;re welcome to join the User Experience team and help us fix up the UI, we&#039;d love to have that.

  http://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:UE

  -Max</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bugzilla absolutely can be improved. <img src='http://gnufied.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  We&#8217;ve made some UI improvements in 3.2, and we&#8217;d like to make more. You&#8217;re welcome to join the User Experience team and help us fix up the UI, we&#8217;d love to have that.</p>
<p>  <a href="http://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:UE" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:UE</a></p>
<p>  -Max</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikolaj Hald Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://gnufied.org/2009/01/23/amarok2-and-redefinition-of-awesomeness/#comment-3180</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikolaj Hald Nielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnufied.org/?p=119#comment-3180</guid>
		<description>oh...

I dont think we have ever tried to withhold it, and its all over our irc channel topic at least. But the link is http://bugs.kde.org as we use the main kde bugtracker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh&#8230;</p>
<p>I dont think we have ever tried to withhold it, and its all over our irc channel topic at least. But the link is <a href="http://bugs.kde.org" rel="nofollow">http://bugs.kde.org</a> as we use the main kde bugtracker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hemant</title>
		<link>http://gnufied.org/2009/01/23/amarok2-and-redefinition-of-awesomeness/#comment-3179</link>
		<dc:creator>Hemant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnufied.org/?p=119#comment-3179</guid>
		<description>@ Nikolaj

My actual intent was to submit about 5 or 6 bug reports I had about UI and playback issues. I thought forum wasn&#039;t a right place for bug reports and you guys refuse to provide me a direct link and hence the rant. :)

I hope some good comes out of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Nikolaj</p>
<p>My actual intent was to submit about 5 or 6 bug reports I had about UI and playback issues. I thought forum wasn&#8217;t a right place for bug reports and you guys refuse to provide me a direct link and hence the rant. <img src='http://gnufied.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I hope some good comes out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikolaj Hald Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://gnufied.org/2009/01/23/amarok2-and-redefinition-of-awesomeness/#comment-3178</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikolaj Hald Nielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gnufied.org/?p=119#comment-3178</guid>
		<description>&quot;Disclaimer: ...&quot; Never say never... :-D

&quot;Stability : ...&quot; Anecdotal only, I know, but for the most part, Amarok 2 is relatively stable for me, except for brief periods when someone has really screwed up the current trunk. I am wondering if there are greater stability issues with some of the distro packages than on my hand rolled version. In any case, I agree that Amarok 2 is not yet anywhere near as stable as 1.4.10, but the version numbers alone should give a good indication as to why this is. 

&quot;UI : ...&quot; I still think, notwithstanding that the implementation in 2.0.0 and 2.0.1.1 is far from perfect that our idea for the context view is valid. The mechanics of how the context view works is currently getting a major overhaul for 2.1.0 (no more of this buggy zooming stuff) and with some of the other things happening that also affects the applets, it is really starting to mature well in my humble opinion. Sure, some people will not need/use it at all, so it can be hidden just by resizing the playlist and browser.

&quot;Scattered playlist control: ...&quot; I am not convinced that playback controls and playlist controls really need to be in the same area. I do see your point about the playlist buttons ( clear, save, ... ) and search bar being quite far from each other. Conceptually these belong together.

&quot;Amarok Bug tracker : ...&quot; Reading this actually made me go to the front page on our website and look for the bugs/issues/tracker link, and you are right, there is none (I had never noticed since I always use a bookmark). This is something that really should be fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Disclaimer: &#8230;&#8221; Never say never&#8230; <img src='http://gnufied.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8220;Stability : &#8230;&#8221; Anecdotal only, I know, but for the most part, Amarok 2 is relatively stable for me, except for brief periods when someone has really screwed up the current trunk. I am wondering if there are greater stability issues with some of the distro packages than on my hand rolled version. In any case, I agree that Amarok 2 is not yet anywhere near as stable as 1.4.10, but the version numbers alone should give a good indication as to why this is. </p>
<p>&#8220;UI : &#8230;&#8221; I still think, notwithstanding that the implementation in 2.0.0 and 2.0.1.1 is far from perfect that our idea for the context view is valid. The mechanics of how the context view works is currently getting a major overhaul for 2.1.0 (no more of this buggy zooming stuff) and with some of the other things happening that also affects the applets, it is really starting to mature well in my humble opinion. Sure, some people will not need/use it at all, so it can be hidden just by resizing the playlist and browser.</p>
<p>&#8220;Scattered playlist control: &#8230;&#8221; I am not convinced that playback controls and playlist controls really need to be in the same area. I do see your point about the playlist buttons ( clear, save, &#8230; ) and search bar being quite far from each other. Conceptually these belong together.</p>
<p>&#8220;Amarok Bug tracker : &#8230;&#8221; Reading this actually made me go to the front page on our website and look for the bugs/issues/tracker link, and you are right, there is none (I had never noticed since I always use a bookmark). This is something that really should be fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

